Public-level explanation only.
Governed HOLD for review-loop convergence.
HOLD is not passive delay. It is a controllable workflow state before commitment.
Workflow shape
Detect weak signal
HOLD / classify
Minimal return or re-check
Human review gate when needed
Missed-issue reduction
Governed HOLD can preserve selected uncertain candidates long enough for local re-evaluation instead of premature discard or premature commitment.
Review-loop convergence
Fewer missed issues can reduce unresolved residue, repeated correction loops, unnecessary rework, and review fatigue.
What the buyer can test
- Baseline comparison against the current review behavior.
- Risk metrics such as missed handling, wrong return, over-HOLD, review load, and unresolved residue.
- Decision metric: whether the signal justifies deeper technical review.
Boundary risks to measure
- Over-HOLD: too many cases are delayed without enough value.
- Wrong return: the system sends the wrong part of the task back for correction.
- False confidence: a gated workflow is mistaken for a universal safety guarantee.
- Human overload: escalation increases review burden without enough signal quality.
Public boundary
This public overview does not request confidential workflows, private architecture, customer data, production logs, source code, model weights, or implementation details.
Exact thresholds, guard conditions, seed-level implementation, precise metric ratios, and patent-sensitive mappings remain outside this public page.